Wednesday, 6 March 2013

MUNCUL PIHAK-PIHAK DARI KELUARGA KIRAM MENAWAR SOLUSI DAMAI


Selepas insiden serangan ofensif keatas Lahad Datu oleh Pasukan keselamatan dan Angkatan Tentera Malaysia beberapa pihak dari keluarga Kiram III muncul di khalak ramai memalui media menawarkan solusi dan pandangan masing-masing berhubung dengan insiden Lahad Datu. 

Antara nya ialah Sultan Kiram II sendiri, Jurucakap Abraham Idjirani bagi pihak Agbimuddin Kiram yang mengetuai pencerobohan Lahad Datu, Janda-janda Kiram, Wakil Kiram yang membuat pertemuan dengan Menteri Pertahanan Malaysia di PWTC, Pemimpin MNLF Nurmisuari dan mungkin banyak lagi pihak yang belum berpeluang muncul dalam media !.

Persoalannya, apakah motif atau tujuan mereka ini? Adakah mereka benar-benar mencari penyelesaian atau ingin mendapat sesuatu dari kemelut ini dengan menangguk di air yang keruh atau ingin mendapat pengiktirafan dari pihak kerajaan Malaysia atau mana-mana pihak yang mereka rasai dapat dikaitkan dan mendapat imbuhan daripada usaha itu.

Sejak tahun 1980an penghijrahan mendadak berlaku dari selatan Filipina ke Sabah kerana ingin mencari kedidupan yang lebih baik. Ramai kalangan mereka bekeluarga dan menetap dan memperolehi kerakyatan tetap Malaysia. Pembangunan Sabah kian pesat berbanding tempat asal mereka di Selatan Filipina dan ini memberi peluang mencari rezeki di Sabah.

Projek IC seolah mengiktiraf kedatangan mereka dan pendatang lain dari kawasan lain sehingga jumlah mereka di Sabah sudah sampai ke paras yang melibihi penduduk asal.

Adakah jumlah itu menjadi suatu sebab, selain berasaskan tuntutan sejarah kesultanan Sulu, mengapa keluarga Kiram menjadi lebih selesa dan berani untuk coba menakluk Sabah atau sekurang-kurang memberi isyarat awal kepada kerajaan Malaysia bahawa mereka (Keluarga Kiram) sudah mempunyai pengaruh yang kuat yang sudah meresap sebagai penduduk Sabah?

Keluarga Kiram telah menerima sewa tahunan yang dibayar oleh  kerajaan Malaysia melalui Peguam mereka di Filipina dan amaun ini amat kecil nilainya berbanding nilainya berpuluh tahun yang lalu.  

Penemuan kekayaan minyak di luar pantai Sabah yang berpotensi mengeluar minyak bernilai berbillion dan hasil-hasil lain telah melonjakkan tahap pembangunan fisikal dan sosio-ekonomi Sabah berbanding kawasan mereka di selatan Flipina, sudah pasti menjadi tarikan untuk mereka membuka ruang baru mendapat  tambahan imbuhan,  sama ada dalam bentuk kenaikan sewa atau persejuan lain yang setimpal bagi mereka dan ini termasuklah kemungkinan mendapat pengiktirafan sebagai Sultan atau ketua Negeri Sabah seperti lain-lain negeri di Semenanjung.

Apa-apa pun,  disebalik semua angkara yang berlaku di Lahad Datu semuanya berkisar kepada Fulus/ mahu kesejahteraan hidup dan kuasa walau pun ianya di persembahkan dalam pelbagai cara.

Monday, 18 February 2013

PETRONAS MUST DELEGATE ITS ADMINISTRATIVE POWER TO OIL PRODUCING STATES


Committee with Petronas to resolve MTEM's complaint that Petronas is favouring foreign companies instead of local and Malay companies in awarding job proposed .

As much as it is MTEM's concern, It is also every citizen's concern that the country's natural resources be made to  benefit all the people in this country in all term of fairness, whether through direct involvement or otherwise.

Petronas must not only be obliged to protect local oil and gas business industry, it must also  share and delegate its administrative power to oil producing states for them to administer and manage all oil field  within its border before any contract works are to be awarded to any qualified local Malaysian contractors.

This arrangement, would not affect the participation and or involvement of the local players, particularly those in MTEM.

What  this really emphasize is to get the poor people in the rich oil producing state, who has been deprived over the past 39 years of the enjoyment of employment opportunity to participate and be part of the industry whether through direct employment and or other form of involvement.

The fact is that the four(4) oil rich producing states in Malaysia are states having the most poorest people in comparation to those in  non-oil producing states. 

Thus by making this sort of arrangement, the economic standing of the people of the oil producing states can be elevated and poverty  be eradicated  within just a short period of time  and investors and or business flourish over cheaper and competitive manpower cost that is readily available locally.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KUALA LUMPUR (Feb 14): The Malay Economic Action Council, formed by 47 Malay business groups, today claimed that Petronas is willing to listen to their demands for more job awards after holding a meeting with them yesterday.
Petronas has proposed forming a joint committee with this council, whose Malay name is Majlis Tindakan Ekonomi Melayu (MTEM), to address issues brought up by the latter, according to council chairman Syed Ali Alattas.
Syed Ali told a press conference the proposed committee with Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) is to resolve MTEM’s complaints that Petronas isMalay  favouring foreign companies instead of local and Malay companies in awarding jobs.
However, no Petronas representative was present at the media conference.
"We have received many complaints from local entrepreneurs that they have been marginalised by Petronas when it comes to doing business," Syed Ali said.
He added that Petronas, which has allocated RM300 billion for capital expenditure in 2011-2015, “is now willing to listen to us”.
Due to this development, MTEM is drafting a letter to Petronas’ president and CEO Tan Sri Shamsul Azhar Abbas, putting in writing what had been agreed at the meeting.
Syed Ali said he expects Petronas to respond to the letter by February 21.
In response to a question from the Edge on whether MTEM has proposed a quota for Malays entrepreneurs, MTEM CEO Mohd Nizam Mahshar said there is no need for a quota system as local firms aiming for oil and gas projects already have the expertise.
He said Petronas could practice a merit-based system, giving more focus to local firms instead of their international counterparts.
"We believe there are many capable Malay and local companies. While Petronas has been awarding contracts and conducting business with local firms, we believe it can do more (business) with the locals," he said.
MTEM said it is a group consisting 47 Malay entrepreneur non-governmental organisations (NGO) of various sectors, including oil and gas.
In an interview published by Bernama yesterday, former Prime Minister and Petronas's adviser Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad said Petronas is "caught" between championing its “founding objective” of uplifting the Bumiputera business community and to open up its business for foreign participation in line with its business globalisation plan.
"If we only look for high-skilled companies, definitely foreign companies will be better than the locals," he said in the interview.
Earlier this month, Syed Ali had urged Shamsul to step down as Petronas's president and CEO for failing to help more Malay companies.
He however has stopped this call today.
Reuters reported that last year, Petronas gave RM28 billion in dividends to the Malaysian government – its only shareholder.


http://my.news.yahoo.com/petronas-pressured-47-malay-groups-oil-gas-jobs-084609325--sector.html


Friday, 11 January 2013

DI MANA KEADILAN BN UNTUK SARAWAK ?


Keadilan Miri Hanis Adenan, PR senantiasa akan mara membela Rakyat Malaysia dan Sibuti bukan pengecualian, tanpa mengira kekuatan kubu-bu mana mana parti dibawah BN.

Selama 47 tahun Dasar BN hanya mementingkan agenda BN UMNO dan komponen parti BN Sawak gagal untuk membela rakyat Sarawak walau pun umum mengetahui Sarawak mengatahui bahawa Sarawak adalah Negeri yang paling kaya dalam Malaysia.

Tanggungjawab untuk membangun Sarawak dan penduduknya telah diketepikan dengan penyerahan Kuasa keatas Minyak dan Gas oleh parti tempatan sendiri manakala kekayaan hutan balaknya di monopoli oleh kroni dan keluarga pemimpin BN itu sendiri.

Akhirnya Rakyat yang menjadi mangsa. Yang amat merisaukankan ialah status rakyat Sarawak dianatara yang termiskin dalam Malaysia.

MP Sibuti Sendiri adalah bukan anak tempatan walau pun sejak ini berhijrah masuk kedalam kawasan sibuti.

Setelah 47 tahun memerintah kemudahan ASAS masih menjadi agenda sudah tentu menunjukkan kelemahan yang nyata di pihak BN.

Peluang penceburan dalam Industri minyak yang pada suatu masa dulu (sebelum 1974) amat membanggakan dan anak-anak tempatan boleh cari makan. Sekarang anak-tempatan dipinggir dan pekerjaan dimonopoli oleh kroni BN UMNO yang merupakan sekutu komponen BN Sarawak sendiri.

Syarikat minyak dimonopoli oleh syarikat gergasi milik anak bekas PM dan menantu PM dan kroni BN/UMNO yang bernilai beratus juta adalah suatu dasar yang mempunyai unsur pembolotan yang amat nyata dan BN Sarawak tidak berupaya untuk menegani ketidak seimbangnya peluang perniagaan dalam industri ini. 

Umum mengatahui bahawa kemudahan asas seperti Jalan Raya di Sarawak adalah dalan keadaan yang amat daif dan BN melalui dasar kerajaan persekutuan terus membuta mata dan memberi tumpuan keada projek mewah seperti Litar Lumba, Bangunan kembar dan kemaraan ini akan terus berlaku dengan cadangan membina "Merdeka Tower" walau pun tidak ddibiayai keseluruhan oleh wang rakyat.

Inilah dasar yang berat sebelah dan tidak memihak kepada keperluan negeri Sarawak dan dasar ini disokong secara melulu oleh komponen BN Sarawak sehingga rakyat Swak menjadi rakyat yang termiskin dalam Malaysia.

Kalau BN Swak betul-betul membela anak Sarawak kenapa p pembahagian peluang ini memihak kepada kroni BN UMNO yang merupakan sekutu BN Sarawak? 

Sekarang barulah kononnya telah mebela dan akan membela ana-anak Sarawak padahal telah bersekongkol merampas hak didepan mata ana-anak sarawak sendiri.

Anak tempatan mencari pekerjaan di luar negera dan tahap pemgganguran semakin tinggi.

MP SIBUTI --- KENYATAAN PUTAR BELIT


Kenyataan MP Sibuti mengatakan bhw PR sebagai parti luar adalah kurang tepat. Calon yang bertanding adalah dari kalangan anak tempatan sendiri.

Adakah beliau anak tempatan Sibuti?

Adalahkah BN itu sendiri bebas dari pengaruh dan dasar yang dibuat oleh UMNO?

Kenapa BN PBB menyerah keseluruhan hasil Petroleum / Gas Kepada Petronas Melalui Kerajaan Pusat yang di ketuai oleh UMNO? dan mengapa akur dengan hanya 5% royalti sejak 1974 dalam pada mengatahui hakikat bahawa rakyat Sarawak adalah antara yang termiskin di Malaysia?

MP yang buat putar belit hanya untuk selamat diri sendiri!!!!! Tolak pemimpim sebegini.

Rakyat tidak lagi mampu dibebani oleh pemimpin sebegini lagi!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday, 26 December 2012

"A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN MIRI RESORT CITY"

"Bring me back to my hotel room" said an old friend who came to Miri for a short holiday. Brought him to see Grand Old Lady and later Taman Awam. 

You have to spend at least 3/4 day to experience Lambir National Park and 2-4 day for Mulu. I'm not trying to conquer Hilamayas...I want to have a lite one he said....yawning!!!

The following day I brought him to Lutong to see the "OIL REFINERY" without its Oil, and stopped at the old unused "Lutong Air Strip, the one and only Miri Styled Drag race and ofcource adjacent to that (the beach) the "MAKAK BUBOK" livehood event of scooping shrimp for the not less popular MIRI BELACAN!!.....The thing of the past... AN OIL TOWN, BELACAN TOWN and now AN UNKNOWN RESORT CITY....Friend, I am your driver as well as your tourist guide at my own pleasure..please don't complain..I said.

Thursday, 13 December 2012

FREEDOM - FREEDOM PROSPERS WHEN GOD'S COMMANDMENT IS ACKNOWLEDGED

FOR AN OLD RECYLED ISSUES BROUGHT ABOUT @ P218 LAMAN LAMAN DEBAT SEBUTAI

# Pork abattoir in Kedah. (Freedom of Food)

It was found to be an illegal abattoir,  NOT because Islamic law says that it is an Illegal abattoir but because the local municipality rules say so.  

The writer tried to infuse religious sentiments and  harp on its sensitivities to instill fear to the non-muslim about "Pas's Hudud Law" ( as they wish to equate it to)

The Qur’an prohibits the consumption of pork (Swine) in no less than 4 different places. It is prohibited in 2:173, 5:3, 6:145 and 16:115.

The Bible prohibits the consumption of pork, in the book of Leviticus, the book of Deuteronomy and a similar prohibition is repeated in the Bible in the book of Isaiah chapter 65 verse 2-5.

The issue on the Illegal abattoir in Kedah has nothing to do with the verses in the Quran and the Bible* but purposely raised to create animosity and split amongst the multi religious, cultured and ethnic in the country to serve the selfish interest of BN.


# Alcohol - raid (Freedom of Drinks)

Does it make sense to raid a teh tarik stall for alcohol drinker?   One must go to the place where alcohol are sold  and consumed to find if any muslim is consuming them at such place.  

Muslims are bound by rules in the Quran pertaining consumption of Alcohol and  "freedom of Drinks" of alcohol is totally not involved here unless you are involved in creating new "religion" with right and freedom to consume alcohol for other religion.

The Glorious Quran prohibits the consumption of alcohol in [AL-Qur’an 5:90] and there are also Prohibition of alcohol in the Bible [Proverbs 20:1] and [Ephesians 5:18]

The verses above does not limit the freedom of the non-believers.


# Billboards advertisement-dress code even to the non – Muslims in Pakatan Rakyat Kedah administration. (Freedom of Dress Code)"

Decency is not limited only to muslim.  It is a universally accepted norms. To have a municipal council granting or promoting indecency to the public is deemed very irresponsible. 

The point here is not about freedom but the intention of the writer  to point, redicule and associate Freedom of dress code to the islamic Hudud laws to scare those other than the muslim.

A young woman who worked in a Bank's  front desk dressed in G-String and Laced-bra right in heart of the world's  modern city would land herself in trouble if the dress she is wearing is prohibited by her employer (the Bank). 

Blaming the bank, the city council and the West for trying to limit her freedom to dress as such is absolutely ubsurd.

If walking naked in the street is a norm,  can you tell me that having clothing on be regarded as indecent? 

All the 12 points on freedom here is not all about freedom but it is an attempt to ridicule and paint a real bad image on PAS and Hudud Laws whilst  trying to embed and instill religious stereotype amongst Malaysian.