Thursday, 20 November 2014

NEW COMPANIES ACT - PART 3 (ii)

PART 3 (ii)


(12)  ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (AGM)



EXISTING LAW

“Annual General Meeting”  is defined under Section 143 as


(1) A general meeting of every company to be called the "annual general meeting" shall in addition to any other meeting be held once in every calendar year and not more than fifteen months after the holding of the last preceding annual general meeting, but so long as a company holds its first annual general meeting within eighteen months of its incorporation, it need not hold it in the year of its incorporation or in the following year.


(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) the Registrar on the application of the company, may if for any special reason he thinks fit so to do, extend the period of fifteen months or eighteen months referred to in that subsection, notwithstanding that such period is so extended beyond the calendar year.


(3) Subject to notice being given to all persons entitled to receive notice of the meeting a general meeting may be held at any time and the company may resolve that any meeting held or summoned to be held shall be at the annual general meeting of the company.


(4) If default is made in holding an annual general meeting—


(a) the company and every officer of the company who is in default shall be guilty of an offence against this Act;
Penalty: Five thousand ringgit.
Default penalty: One hundred ringgit; and


        (b) the Court may on the application of any member order a general
          meeting to be called




THE NEW LAW WILL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING


  • Public companies are required to hold AGM every calendar year

  • The law does not require private companies to hold AGM in every callender year.

  • Meetings of private companies are known as meeting of members.

  • The main method for private companies to make decision will be by way of written resolution.


As usual, AGM is still required for Public companies to ensure that the director use the AGM as a platform to report to shareholders.


However in the case of private companies (ie  SDN BHD) where in most cases its shareholders and directors are the same people, the AGM accorded through the AGM platform is no longer relevant.


However, notwithstanding the above. Shareholders still have the right to call for meeting when required.




RESOLUTION IN WRITIG (Circular resolution)

EXISTING LAW

Written Resolution requires unanimous vote before resolution could be passed.

That is, resolution must be signed by all members – in case of members resolution and all directors in case of directors resolution.


NEW LAW

  • Provision relating to written resolution are only applicable to private companies.

  • The required percentage to pass a resolution will be similar as though the resolution would be passed at a meeting of members.


This is deregulatory measures to provide flexibility for private companies to make decision more efficiently.



EXISTING LAW

Threshold allowing circulation of statement by members holding at least 5% of paid up capital or 100 members can request for circulation of statements.


NEW LAW

  • Member’s power to require circulation of written resolution.

  • Members having a total of 2.5% voting rights or 50 members wo have right to vote and for companies not having a share capital, members having a total of 2.5% voting right to be allowed to a statement to demand, alter or add items into AGM’s agenda. However, the company has the option of not to circulate the statements if they are frivolous, vexatious or defamatory and if such statement is not in the best interest of the company

Reason why the above provision are introduced

The lowering of the threshold would make it easier for members to be involved and to determine the agenda for deliberation in the general meeting.

It also enhances shareholders’ activism.

It provides an avenue of escalating external pressure to create change as well as to increase company’s efficiency.


MEETINGS AT TWO OR MORE VENUES

The current law allows

  • A company may hold meetings within Malaysia at more that one venues using nay technology that allows members reasonable opportunity to participate

NEW LAW

 
  • A company may hold meeting at more than one venues using any technology or method that enables member of the company an opportunity to participate and exercise their right to speak and vote at the meeting.

  • Main meeting venue shall be in Malaysia where the chairperson is present.


The above proposal is made to accord flexibility to companies when holding meeting of members.



APPOINTMENT OF PROXIES


EXISTING LAW


Appointmnet of Proxy

  • Proxy can be appointed from amongst members of the company.

  • Otherwise proxies shall be an advocate, an auditor or person approved by the Registrar.



NEW LAW


Appointmnet of Proxy

  • A member of a company may appoint another person as his proxy.

  • Dispensation of qualification of proxy.


The above proposal is made to allow members to decide on who should be the most appropriate person to represent him at the meeting of members. 


The proposed amendment is very cautious to any possible abuse of right or power while maintaining flexibility to attain efficiency in companies.

  

To be continued on PART 3 –(iii)

Mohdar Ismail

Company Secretarial Practitioner

No comments:

Post a Comment