PART 2(ii) – CONTINUATION
I received a message (FB
Inbox) telling me to express in the simplest form so that the ordinary layman
can understand the Law.
I’ll try my
best to do that while maintaining what
the law actually try to say and avoiding changing the true meaning/definition attached
to it.
I am torn between the two world and may have to use more stroke/forward slash (“/”) and parenthesis/Bracket all the way through.
4) COMMON SEAL
I am torn between the two world and may have to use more stroke/forward slash (“/”) and parenthesis/Bracket all the way through.
4) COMMON SEAL
The current Companies Act requires a company to have common seal for the execution of document by affixing company’s common seal along with its authorized signatory.
The proposed new Companies
Act makes common seal an optional requirement.
If a company decide to have a
common seal, the provision of the law must be observed and thus execution of
documents can be done by affixing common seal as provided in the company’s
constitution OR execution of document can be done by at least two person of
which having been granted authority by the board.
If the company has only one
director, execution of document can be done singly in the presence of witness.
Common seal becomes an
optional requirement and thus save cost
and time of company.
5) COMPANY NAME
Currently, company’s name must be approved by the registrar. Name cannot be similar to any existing company’s name and Name must be reserved (s.22(6))
Currently, company’s name must be approved by the registrar. Name cannot be similar to any existing company’s name and Name must be reserved (s.22(6))
The proposed law requires
that company’s name must be approved and it cannot be identical to any other
existing name.
Reservation of name is now
an optional matter. If the proposed name is not available, The Registrar has
the power assign specific expression for it.
These changes are made to
simplify the procedures involving company naming.
RESHAPING THE BOARD (BOARD
OF DIRECTORS) TOWARDS BOARDROOM /MEETING EXCELLENCE
DEFINITION OF DIRECTORS
Section 4 of the current
Companies Act defines director to
includes any person occupying the position of director of a corporation by
whatever name called and includes a person in accordance with whose directions
or instructions the directors of a corporation are accustomed (familiar/used
to) to act and an alternate or substitute director
The proposed new law
defines director to include any person occupying the position of director of a
corporation by whatever name called and includes a person in accordance with
whose directions or instructions majority of the directors of a corporation are
accustomed (familiar/used to) to act and an alternate or substitute director
That is it. By inserting the word “majority of” reshaped
the boardroom. The provision clarifies (explains) the definition of “shadow
directors” by clarifying that a person is deemed (believed/considered/supposed) to be director if the majority of directors
act in accordance to his direction or instructions.
DIRECTOR
Section 122. Directors
(1) Every company shall
have at least two directors, who each has his principal or only place of
residence within Malaysia .
(2) No person other than a
natural person of full age shall be a director of a company.
The proposed new law
Every private company shall
have at least one directors, and every public company must have at least two
directors who must ordinarily resides in Malaysia
And Directors must be at least
18 years old.
The rationale behind this
is to facilitate ease of doing business by allowing private companies to
have only one director and retaining the requirement for public companies to
have at least two directors to safeguard the interest of the public and that
the minimum age for a person to be appointed as director is 18 years.
PERSONS CONNECTED (HAVING
TIES/RELATION) WITH DIRECTOR
Now fasten you seat belt. It gets complicated now :)
Existing Company Law
Who is called person(s) connected with directors?
Who is called person(s) connected with directors?
Person connected with
director
“a member of that
director’s family” shall include his spouse, parent, child (including adopted
child and step-child), brother, sister and spouse of his child, brother or
sister.
“a director” is deemed to
have control in a body corporate if he holds more than 15% of the issued shares
or the voting power or able to control the board of the body corporate.
The proposed law
Person connected with
director
“a member of that
director’s family” means his spouse, parent, child (including adopted child and
step-child, brother, sister and spouse of his child, brother or sister.
“a director” is deemed to
have control in a body corporate if he holds more than 20% of the issued shares
or the voting power or able to control the board of the body corporate.
The changes is indicated in
the bold letter.
The changes are made to the
above clauses in order to clarify that family members of a director is
consisted of only those falling within the category and also to clarify as to
when director is deemed to have control over a body corporate.
The controlling interest is
increased from 15%-20%
To be continued
Mohdarismail
Company Secretarial Practitioner
Company Secretarial Practitioner
No comments:
Post a Comment